Follow Me on Pinterest
What Bugs Me
Employer's horror: She has to bear medical expenses after maid gives birth

STOMPer Sabrina was appalled after she got saddled with medical bills and repatriation costs for her maid who gave birth within three months of employment. The STOMPer wonders how the maid got through the medical check-ups without the pregnancy setting off any alarm.

The STOMPer wrote:

"I employed an Indonesian maid to look after my mother (not living with me) in February this year but returned her to the maid agency last Friday (May 04) and got an alarming piece of news yesterday (May 08) -- that she has given birth to a healthy baby boy in the office of the maid agency!

"How can this be possible since she was only in Singapore for less than three months. Now, the maid agency says that according to MOM's (Ministry of Manpower) rules and regulations, the employer is to bear all the medical fees and costs for repatriating the maid and the baby.

"In the first place, the maid should be at least 6 months pregnant when she arrived in Singapore -- how could she have passed the full medical check-up?

"Furthermore, the medical check-up is handled by the maid agency, not me!

"As such, shouldn't the maid agency be responsible for the costs or go after the doctor who did the medical check-up?

"I checked through the contract that I signed with the maid agency -- under clause 15, it's stated that 'in the event FDW (Foreign Domestic Worker) falls ills or suffers personal injury...employer shall bear all the medical costs'.

"Can an 'unexpected' birth be classified as an illness or injury?

"The agency is going to discharge the maid and the baby from NUH today (May 09).

"Is there any of you out there who has a similar story to share? Is there any immediate action I should take to protect my rights?

"I am very very sad. Staff from MOM called me up yesterday too and surprisingly, she told me that they are not going to mediate the matter involving.

"She advised me to settle the bill and send the maid back as soon as possible and said 'it has nothing to do with MOM as the ministry issued work permits based on medical reports'.

"Who should I turn to then?"

Keywords:  maid pregnant
LOL
4%
Cute
2%
Shiok
1%
Fail
2%
OMG
1%
Bochup
1%
Ewww!
0%
So Sad
1%
Enraged
88%
Rated  
  by 7 STOMPer(s).      
47324 Views
109 comments
blackguy said   on 4 Jun, 2012   Report as offensive  
GO FIND MP LAH COMMON SENSE... any Taiji with other govt sectors GO FIND YOUR MP.. -.- Z_Z
marlenegwee said   on 1 Jun, 2012   Report as offensive  
STOMPer Sabrina kindly please let us know which agency did you get your maid from? so all of us will never get any maid from them.
marlenegwee said   on 1 Jun, 2012   Report as offensive  
go make a police report. then go to see your Minister in your area for help!
azurexen said   on 25 May, 2012   Report as offensive  
dont hire better, heard from a few relatives that their grandparents get their money stolen while kids lose their electronic devices..
qwertyuiop1234567890 said   on 21 May, 2012   Report as offensive  
MOM is like that one leh.. Useless.
cspeh said   on 17 May, 2012   Report as offensive  
Numerous feedback and valuable time had been provided by the people. I think it is long overdue for MOM to do something fair to all parties. This will sustain the Trust the people have on them and justify our people to continue paying the Maid Levy.

To champion Labour Productivity, MOM should also lead by example. This saga witness not just poor productivity, but incompetence of MOM officers which allows exploitation by maids and its agency on the helpless folks. I don't know what to say.. Sigh... Don't have to set up another Board of Inquiry like SMRT, just hired or get some student intern to fix it. For the sake of all, I will volunteer for this job to help review the system, Free-Of-Charge, even though I am out of a paying job.
cspeh said   on 17 May, 2012   Report as offensive  
I have brought this case of unfair contractual terms to MOM stipulated as mandatory by MOM and the maid agency a year ago. The response from MOM was negative. I am still furious as why MOM can't see that, when a layman or a legal student intern will easily notice the flaw in the contract. If MOM want the full authority to set the contract, then they should bear the TOTAL RESPONSIBILITY. It is easy to be angels and make employers looks like demons for not taking care of the maids.

With agencies and govt calling for fair human rights accord to maids/foreign workers, it should also be fair that employers are accorded their rights and protected from being exploited by these claims.

MOM, I brought this up to you a year ago, so please don't say 'it has nothing to do with MOM as the ministry issued work permits based on medical reports'. If that is so, please don't dictate on the contracts between Employers and the Maid.

cspeh said   on 17 May, 2012   Report as offensive  
It boils down to Clauses 15 and 21 of the Maid-Employer Contract easily exploited by maids and their agencies. These 2 clauses grant super rights to maids more than our own govt and our own employers can provide for ourselves and our own parents/children.

I was enraged why they don't set or allow a cap on the medical coverage. Even our CPF Medishield and Company health insurance has limited max coverage. So, beware, legally if you signed the standard contract, you could be sued to take care of the maid for life until you bankrupt.