This Urban Jungle
Can finger length really reveal if you're better at math or language?

Can the relative length of your index and fourth fingers really reveal what you're good at? That's what STOMPer Geomancer wonders after reading a newspaper article that made the claim.

In the article, the writer claims that people with longer ring fingers are better at Mathematics while those with longer index fingers are more artsy.

A report the sender found on the internet also states that finger length could reflect which part of the brain is more developed, and all this is determined by the levels of testosterone and oestrogen (male and female sex hormones respectively) that one is exposed to as a baby.

In an email, Geomancer says:

"A local Chinese daily published a report which claims that 'people whose ring finger is longer than the index finger are more proficient in Math and those whose index finger is longer are proficient in the liberal arts'.

"According to writer Hua Jing Jing, a Taiwan TV station carried out a survey of those who are proficient in Math, and found that 23 out of 29 have ring fingers longer than the index fingers. The writer also claims that in NUS High School of Math and Science, 17 out of 20 students have ring fingers longer than their index fingers.

"I took this picture of a Sec 4 student and his ring finger is longer than his index finger.

"He told me that he has been representing the school in the Math Olympiad from Primary 3 to Sec 4. Invariably the Math teacher has chosen him for Math competitions as he is the best in the class.

"I saw another online report by psychologist Mark Brosnan of the University of Bath which found that students with longer ring fingers than index fingers scored better in math tests than in literacy and or verbal tests.

"Students with longer index fingers, on the other hand, fared better in language and literacy than math.

"The more testosterone a baby is exposed to, the longer his ring finger will be. The greater is his exposure to oestrogen, the longer his index finger is.

"The length of the finger actually indicates which part of the brain is more developed.

"Since testosterone promotes the development of the brain that is responsible for math and spatial skills, a longer ring finger indicates better numerical abilities.

"Conversely, exposure to oestrogen contributes to the growth of the part of the brain linked to literacy skills, so a longer index finger means more developed reading, writing and verbal proficiency."

Rated  
  by 4 STOMPer(s).      
16372 Views
35 comments
Blazer433 said   on 14 Apr, 2011   Report as offensive  
i have longer ring finger
carlisto said   on 25 May, 2010   Report as offensive  
I thought everyone has longer index fingers?? Anyway, the research can only draw a correlational conclusion; no real cause-effect relationship can be established...
Januarybaby said   on 1 Mar, 2010   Report as offensive  
I think the research itself has some problem. Maybe it's just most people have longer ring finger. Because they did not do any survey of people who are better in Arts like the students in art school? They only did survey on people who are better in maths. Isnt it weird=/
sagachan said   on 16 Dec, 2009   Report as offensive  
REALLY?
MY RING FNGER IS LONGER...
but i hate math and love arts...
nicovante said   on 10 Dec, 2009   Report as offensive  
Out of curiosity, I wonder why the survey base is so small for both statistics are so small. It is only two digits and i don't see how a small scale study can actually back a claim involving the entire human race. Way to go for trying to legitimize your urban myth
nicovante said   on 10 Dec, 2009   Report as offensive  
Notice how the writer dishes tonnes of statistics to back up hios purported claim that people with longer ring fingers are better at maths. (eg. NUS, Taiwan TV Station). Conversely, notice how these cheesy statistics are not present for those who are supposedly better at liberal arts. Maybe, there is a higher percentage of people with longer ring fingers, hence the skewered statistics?
NepaliKanchi said   on 27 Nov, 2009   Report as offensive  
This is bullshit - palm reading, face reading, length of finger, etc are all bullshit. Who are we to be able to make conclusions on this load of crap??? Almighty God made everyone different.

Next we will have someone who claims that an individual's toe size or depth of belly button can be established as better in baking or cooking. What the frug!
wonderkit said   on 22 Nov, 2009   Report as offensive  
seriously, when did 23 out of 29 is 100%. this article only shows that most with longer ring finger is better at math. U all understand the word: 'MOST'??? seems like u all have short fingers.