Don't miss these...
Follow Me on Pinterest
This Urban Jungle
Family of dead Ferrari driver sues insurers

The wife and mother of the dead Ferrari driver are taking the vehicle’s insurers to court after they said they were withdrawing coverage for the deadly crash.

The insurers, AXA Insurance Singapore, had told Mr Ma Chi’s family that the crash on May 12 was a “collision” – not an accident, according to the suit filed in the High Court last week.

In the insurance industry, this means the driver was aware that his actions would cause an accident, thereby voiding the insurers’ liability to make a payout.

By suing AXA, Mr Ma’s family wants the High Court to reject this finding by AXA.

The lawsuit, believed to be the first such reported case in Singapore, is emerging as a public interest issue as to what the circumstances, under which an insurer can reject liability by treating accidents as “collisions”, are.

In the crash, Mr Ma had allegedly run a red light in Rochor Road. He rammed into a taxi, which then hit a motorcycle. The accident left three, including Mr Ma, dead and two others injured.

AXA first informed the Ma family of its decision to repudiate its liability last month.
In the same month, the family replied, stating they disagreed with AXA’s position, according to court documents filed.

AXA responded by asking the family not to liquidate any of Mr Ma’s assets, and said the case should be arbitrated.

They also asked the family to supply a list of his other assets.

The family’s lawyer Wendell Wong then filed a suit asking the High Court to rule that the crash was indeed an accident and not a “collision” as claimed by AXA.

“It is not an easy decision but the family feels that we need to seek the assistance of the Singapore courts as the insurer made the decision to repudiate liability first,” said a statement released by the family yesterday.

“We just want to follow the Singapore laws as to what we need to do following the accident that affected people’s lives.”

A High Court pre-trial conference has been scheduled for next month.

Check out more court stories in the Courtroom

  Click on thumbnails for larger image
Keywords:  crime
LOL
5%
Cute
4%
Shiok
0%
Fail
61%
OMG
0%
Bochup
2%
Ewww!
0%
So Sad
6%
Enraged
22%
Rated  
  by 4 STOMPer(s).      
27632 Views
61 comments
blurpynicnic said   on 4 Sep, 2012   Report as offensive  
PRCs brewing trouble again....
The video footage is already a concrete evidence, and MaChi's family still thought they could cheat the rules and regulation, and dreaming of the pie of compensation money...
andreneng said   on 31 Aug, 2012   Report as offensive  
For once, I think the insurers did right.
Accident vs Collision.
How can one payout when the insured purposefully risked his life (and others)?
If so, in desperate situations u will see many debted gamblers ramming their vehicles.
augustchua said   on 23 Aug, 2012   Report as offensive  
whether we like PRC or not,let's put aside, but when we have to be reasonable. when we buy insurance, we expect payout but here, it seems AXA is playing with words, don't want to pay insurance? a flood is a flood and notponding. whether accident or collison is the same, please look into the dictionary. i amsure nobody would like it but it happen to you.
ocliff70 said   on 23 Aug, 2012   Report as offensive  
I think they have forgotten their Embassy's warning to "live graciously and abide by local laws"
ocliff70 said   on 23 Aug, 2012   Report as offensive  
Of course the insurance is for accidents, not for reckless acts. Insurance should sue you for the compensation paid to the victims.
berddy632 said   on 23 Aug, 2012   Report as offensive  
Understand when an accident occurred, all victims have the right to claim against the faulty driver's insurance company.
I do not know what will happen to the victims if insurance company refuses to pay. Maybe some stompers working in the insurance firms can contribute their views.
gamerkhai said   on 22 Aug, 2012   Report as offensive  
Not bad, thick skin. One day, the family will get karma!
michaelchong said   on 21 Aug, 2012   Report as offensive  
***** these PRCS. Should ban PRCs with such a huge assets.
They confirm bring harm to singapore one with those dirty money
Don't miss these...